SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

topic posted Mon, June 26, 2006 - 6:40 PM by  Troy
I was shocked and embarrassed to walk by a sign at yesterdays SF Pride which read; "Radical Faeries Only"...
Is that what the Faeries are about? Segregation? Exclusion? Clickishness? Us Only? Only the Annointed Enter Here?

Is Faerie Village now succumbing to the same anti-inclusionary philosophies which I hear plague Nominus and Wolf Creek?

How disappointing. I hope the sign was put upby the overall SF Pride organization by mistake, but I suspect that it was put up by some snobbish faerie..

I think this topic warrants discussion: is it not up to the indiviiudal to self-identify as a faerie, or is there a hazing-committee now?
I thought the RF's were where everybody was welcome, regardless of their race, their class, their fashion,their pecsize, or whatever...

I hope someone who is more informed then me will respond and tell me what they think, or, if they know, what on Earth the philosophy behind this sign might be.
posted by:
Troy
Netherlands
  • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

    Mon, June 26, 2006 - 10:41 PM
    Wow. Good looking out Troy. I'm anxious to here what the response might be.
    • my first take on it was... that the sign encouraged people to think of themselves as faeries, since such a variety of people were lining up to enter. When I walked past the line had a bunch of middle-aged female asians & others I don't usually think of as faeries. The sign got people to say, "I'm a faerie" - which I thought at the time was kinda cute..... Of course that's cuz I could see that Scooter was just looking people in the eye & saying hello... not challenging people's faerie credentials.

      I liked seeing so many different types of people labeling themselves as RF, and thought it was kindof a fun mind trip. Perhaps it kept the anti-faeries away, but also validate the people thinking "Maybe I'm a faerie" when they were waved inside. In that respect there was a little magik happening there.

      What if the sign said, "Radical faeries only... are you one too?" or something like that to make it more explicitly inclusive?

      If I were a latent faerie just off the boat from iowa or wherever, I would have been too shy to approach that gate, with the sign the way it was this year. I would have assumed I needed to have been annointed at a gathering or something first.
  • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

    Tue, June 27, 2006 - 12:06 AM
    >>I suspect that it was put up by some snobbish faerie.. <<

    giggle!

    who was being excluded?
    did you feel excluded?
    were hazed?

    or maybe you're part of the "annointed" and so you felt safe in entering...

    >>is it not up to the indiviiudal to self-identify as a faerie,<<
    well, i guess it is.

    so, are you a faerie?
    • Unsu...
       

      Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

      Tue, June 27, 2006 - 10:32 AM
      "who was excluded?"

      I hope nobody was excluded or felt excluded. It was a pride rally who's purpose is to celebrate diversity after all. Further one group of radical faeires need to be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21 century in that they do exclude members based soley on gender. That policy makes them stick out like a sore thumb espically at broader queer events like pride. If there is sucha a sign next year then I plan to invite as many non faerie queers to faerie village as I can in order challenge them. Unlike up in Oregon the local officials will not come in to enforce nomenus exclusionary policies, not in San Francisco anyway.
      • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

        Tue, June 27, 2006 - 12:27 PM
        >>Further one group of radical faeires need to be dragged kicking and screaming<<
        Oh honey, will you drag _me_ someplace. Sounds so butch. Very Fred Flinstone. (I can kick and scream, if that's what turns you on...) mmm, smell the testosterone.
        Or did you mean "drag" in the other sense?

        >>they do exclude members....<<
        Who is this "they" to whom you refer? Were "they" are Faerie Village or is this they the they at Wolf Creek or is it the Nomenus they? I'm a little confused about fey and they.

        >>If there is sucha a sign next year then I plan to invite as many non faerie queers to faerie village as I can in order challenge them.<<
        Well, it would be lovely if you showed up (drag or not, screaming or not) and I hope you bring lots of friends. But who are you challenging? And to what are you challenging them?

        It seems to me like you've somehow assumed something. Were you at Faerie Village this year? Did you see the sign? Did you feel excluded? Did you see people who were excluded?
    • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

      Thu, June 29, 2006 - 1:41 PM
      i spoke to people who felt excluded, i was in fact with friends who i had to cajole to come in with me because they felt un-welcome, as they did not (yet) consider themsleves faeries.

      no,i did not feel excluded, but i think all labels are dumb, and refuse to abide...

      Scooterpie, if being a faerie means anyone, even say a straight female christian has the right and the power to identify as such, then yes i am one. if faerie is just another way in which humans seclude themselves fromother humans, then no thank you.

      straight, male, gay, female, queer, you,us,them, we, me, he,allies, she, ze, lgbtqisogwm4pnpbb blabla ub2!!!!!!

      labels, all of them, are dumb; they are about separating an artificial "us", from an artificial "them"...

      labels serve to slow down the much anticipated and long-overdue paradigm shift which is needed in order for mankind to survive the coming RADICAL changes.

      when the icecaps melt SHE aint gonna care about no label. or when the oil-economy fails, or when we run out of fresh drinking water,or when birdflu hits... SHE don't care, and as long as we still do, we will be very, very ill-prepared to withstand any of what we all see coming....
      • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

        Thu, June 29, 2006 - 5:10 PM
        Hi Troy,

        I want to bring up a couple things about your post. First, I see a lot of inherant contradictions in your statements about refusing to be defined by a label on one hand and then on the other you have very strong convictions about what a faerie should & should not be. You also seem to value the differences between what you call faeries and what you call the mundain queer world in another post because you think it's important for more people to be exposed to faeries.

        I really don't care about these contradictions or your definitions or expectations of things.

        What bugs me about your posts & a lot of other posts I see on this thread is the righteous indignation coming from people who weren't involved being tossed up at others who put a lot of time & effort in to make Faerie Village happen this year.

        If I were Shadow or Scooter, I'd seriously be rethinking whether I wanted to do that again next year. Maybe we could try to offer a little more constuctive suggestions or perhaps even be a little more "heart centered".

        Where would you take your friends if there were no Faerie Village next year?
        • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

          Thu, June 29, 2006 - 11:33 PM
          Dear Benjamin,

          Thanks for your comments. I appreciate them.
          Letme say fristlyand categorically (AND I MIGHT HAVE DONE A MUCH BETTER JOB SAYING THIS IN MY FIRST POST), that I apreciate both Scooter and Shadowweavers efforts, as well as all of the efforts of others who were involvedf in setting up Faerie Village. You are also right that I was not there to help, and that,if I had been, I mght have put my two cents in on the spot, when it mattered, and not after the fact, on Tribe. Decisions are, after all, made by those who show up.

          Nowhere in any of my posts, howver, did I single anyone out by name, or try to disparage an individualo for their efforts. None of the my comments or criticism detract from my respect and gratitude towards those who volunteered their time (especially since i do not know most of them, and have no reason to assume their intentions to be anything other then wonderful) I do question wiether those intentions were achieved, and wether the methodology used was the most effective, the most clear, and the most inclusive it couldhave been.I conclude that it was not.

          As far as my statements being contradictory, your probably right about that too; I do not wish to be defined by labels, and yet i find myself ensnared in them every day, with every stepi take and every decision i am faced with. i do not think it is contradictory to acknowledge simultaneously that labels exist, and that we should aim to broaden their definitions as much as possible, in the hope that we may one day completely transcend those labels,untill all of them cease to exist.

          I am afraid that untill we reach that utopian day, my statements on labels will continue to be inherently contradictory.
          In spite of that, I think it is both impoortant and usefull that we have this discussion, because if we do not, we will not ever transcend the labels weare discussing and defining in this threat.

          Further, I do not really have set ideas about what faeries should be. If I suggested that, I need to be clearer. My whole point is, that I believe there is no "should" or "should not", when it comes to faeries ness.

          I do take to heart your suggestion that I be more heart centered. It is part of my Aquarian nature to get all tizzied about social constructs and things I view as abstract, poltical,or philosophical. In that intellectual pursuit, I forget to acknowledge the very human efforts and emotions that underlie those constructs. It is a lesson I am learning, and you are right to make me aware.

          Peace,
          Troy Leaf
          • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

            Fri, June 30, 2006 - 4:37 PM
            thanks for your thoughtful response, troy. i think we're mostly on the same page abt the contradictions with labels & such. they exist. it would be nice to transend them, but i'm not sure they all must be tossed out altogether since they're also used to identify people & communities that serve a useful purpose, which may just be an intrinsic part of human social nature.

            i wouldn't worry about changing anything in your aquarian nature. tizzies over important issues are fine (i know i've thrown my share). however, it's best when they're short-lived, tho, so you can figure out a more effective way of dealing with whatever the problem was (if there actually was a problem).

            peace, benjamin
      • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

        Thu, June 29, 2006 - 11:25 PM
        you directed an indirect question to me "if being a faerie means...."

        well, i didn't say what being a faerie "means", but if you're asking, and since you brought up the whole "label" thing...

        for ME (this is not "cannon" this is only what Scooterpie thinks)

        Radical Faerie is better seen as a verb, not a noun. Radical faeries isn't an organization, its a movement. movement equals action equals verb.

        "Radical Faeries Only" (in my mind) can be read in a variety of ways... one way it can be read is
        "Let there be Radical Faeries Only" or "Let us all be radical faeries"

        Yes, i know that isn't gramatically correct, and that's not my point. my point is to let go of labels in your thinking if you think you don't believe in them.
      • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

        Sat, July 8, 2006 - 1:08 PM
        "i spoke to people who felt excluded"

        Oh, give it up! You didn't feel excluded, but you feel the need to speak up for people whom you believe felt excluded. And yet, not being those people, do you think you know WHY they felt excluded? How do you know what was running through their minds? Persecution complex? Gateway not wide enough? Someone standing at the gate? There are many many reasons why someone might feel excluded. They could be real or imagined reasons.

        It might be better to handle your OWN feelings and not those of others. If you yourself felt excluded, maybe you might have started dialogue with the guy at the gate. But you didn't, did you?

        I guess I'm more than a little tired of people who take offense at everything, especially those who take offense by proxy for others that they THINK they're standing up for.

        Here's an example: I have some friends who have a band called the Shut-Ins. They call themselves a "hulabilly" band because they play both rockabilly and Hawaiian music. The lead instrument is ukulele, and they have a lap steel player. Well, someone got very upset that a "white" band was playing Hawaiian music and put posters all over the Mission (in SF) condemning the Shut-ins for playing the music. Interestingly enough no Hawaiians have ever complained in the 10 years the Shut-Ins have been performing. In fact, people have come up to them and thanked them for keeping Hawaiian music alive.

        So, you see, taking offense by proxy is really not a very good idea. In fact, it's the height of arrogance to purport to speak for others.
        • Unsu...
           

          Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

          Sat, July 8, 2006 - 2:02 PM
          David, instead of attacking the motives of those who did not like the sign how about addressing the issue? The person who began the thread was there and was offended. I really get the feeling that attacking our motives is a way of avoiding discussions of ideas.
          Trying to have "exclusive space" at an event that celebrates diversity is just asking for responses like the ones posted here. I think the shamefull sign itself is one reaso why Nomenus was placed in the hall of shame other queer organizations. The trend in the community and thankfully the world at large is moving away from exclusion and exclusive space.
          • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

            Wed, July 12, 2006 - 12:03 PM
            "David, instead of attacking the motives of those who did not like the sign how about addressing the issue? The person who began the thread was there and was offended."

            People can find offense at just about everything...and they do. All someone had to do was talk with the guy at the gate. Frankly, I'm more than a little tired of people running around all day being offended. Back when I was a hippie or whatever it was I was, we had a phrase, "shine it on", meaning just forget about it and get on with your life.

            Understanding the originator's idea of "Radical faeries only" after reading the reply here, I think it was clever. It might have been even more clever to post a sign saying, "Radical faeries and some trees and streamers only". Then, of course, someone might get offended and ask, "Why aren't ALL trees allowed?"

  • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

    Tue, June 27, 2006 - 11:26 AM
    Hi Troy, it was lovely to see you at Faerie Village this Sunday. I heard about the sign, but didn't really think of it as exclusionary.

    Since insofar as there is such a thing as a rule among faeries, I think most would agree that one of them is that being one is by self-identification. So, if someone believes themself to be a faerie and approach a "faeries only" space, I can't imagine another faerie telling them, "no, you're not a faerie". So, I think such a sign is more about creating intention & awareness that you're in in faerie space. I don't see anything shamefull about that.

    When I read the explaination provided by Shadow on the Bayfae list, I thought it made perfect sense to have some way of regulating the crush of aimless foot traffic of people getting lost & not knowing how to get to the main stage that always happens and has caused complaints in the past.

    I know it's hard to find a perfect solution that will make everyone happy, but I'd love to hear how you'd propose to deal with that problem next year.
  • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

    Tue, June 27, 2006 - 12:56 PM
    i thought the sign was in jest, or at most an intention. i did notice a line of people at one point standing outside and i didn't understand if they weren't being allowed in or not. my posse and i, however, never experienced any trouble entering.
  • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

    Wed, June 28, 2006 - 12:10 PM
    I looked over the fence and didn't see anything any different inside than outside, except some stramers hanging from trees. BFD. So, I didn't try to go in.
    • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

      Wed, June 28, 2006 - 2:48 PM
      Hey David,

      In reality there wasn't much different between the two sides except intention of being in the space. The streamers were part of an art project called Mylar Rain which most people found quite fun to walk through. Funny how simple things can create such magick. Johnny O also created a fascinating mosaic of Harry Hay made up of individual faeries for the color/value. The picture was nice to see coming into focus when walking out of Mylar Rain. I hope you enjoyed your pride day anyhow. And you are especially welcome to come visit next year

      hugs
      Shadow Weaver
      FFV Producer
      • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

        Wed, June 28, 2006 - 4:50 PM
        "I hope you enjoyed your pride day anyhow. And you are especially welcome to come visit next year "

        I generally don't make it to Pride because I have very little affinity for it. I commend people such as Larry-Bob Roberts for putting up the Writer's refuge where people could read their works all afternoon. I also liked that Faerie stage, though I really didn't go for most of the performers (I'm not much into singer/songwriters). Regardless, it was a welcome alternative to the performers on the major stages.

        I'm all for Pride being more a people's event and less a slick homo-gloss event.

        I was there largely to try to be supportive of Larry-Bob's efforts (he puts on the Queer Comedy nights, www.qcomedy.com by the way) and to promote my own effort, Gay Geeks. I passed out a bunch of handouts to bewildered folks.
      • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

        Thu, June 29, 2006 - 3:01 PM
        I heart Mylar Rain!

        That was Neon Christ aka J.H. 's vision... and you can find more photos here, under 2005:
        www.klodhopper.com/joy
        • Re: SHAMEFULL FAERIE VILLAGE SIGN @ SF Pride

          Sat, July 1, 2006 - 11:04 AM
          "Critique without action is complicit with tyranny."

          I want to thank Scooter, Shadow Weaver, et al, for their fabulous annual gift to the Faerie community. It's a huge labor of love and a phenomenal amount of work to make FFV happen each year. I'm sure I have no idea how much time and effort it takes to deal with the logistics, the city departments, the Pride committee, the cops, etc., not to mention the mass of people, some quite insane, who flood the Village each year, plus moving all that heavy stuff around, not just to set it up, but to tear it down with little or no help from the people who took pleasure in it. I am amazed and grateful.

          Faerie Freedom Village is a work in progress, a big experiment that just keeps getting better and more successful. So there may be an occasional glitch, but some people take these things much too seriously. For the creators of FFV to have to deal with the bitching and moaning of self-righteous idealists who haven't lifted a finger and would rather sit at their computers criticizing and demanding, instead of getting off their airy-faerie, utopian asses and pitching in is the truly shameful thing here. If you don't like what they're doing, don't go. The reason so much time gets wasted in the Faeries is there's WAAAY too much talk and pathetically little action.

          And as to why we have fences, I can give you four very good reasons: marijuana, sex, cops, duh. I love the fences, because they shelter us from the hordes of ordinary people with whom I do not wish to deal. FFV is the only reason I go anywhere on Pride day, and it's the only place I go. Thanks again, guys!

Recent topics in "Faerie Village"